Let’s talk

Insights for your business.

Family office MAS approval, annual review and audit: Frequently asked questions

White calculator on a desk

MAS approval for a Singapore single family office under Section 13O or 13U is not a one-off event: the same conditions assessed at application, including AUM, local spending and investment staff, are revisited every year at annual review, and a family office that has moved to the notification framework effective 15 June 2026 still carries ongoing reporting duties rather than a lighter one-time check.

Raffles Corporate Services works with a panel of corporate and employment law firms; this article is general information, not legal advice.

What MAS actually checks at approval

At initial approval, MAS assesses the fund’s committed capital, the credentials and location of its investment professionals, its planned local business spending, and the credibility of its Singapore substance more broadly, meaning genuine decision-making activity rather than a nominal office. For single family offices specifically, MAS finalised a structure-agnostic class exemption effective 15 June 2026, with a transition deadline of 15 June 2027 for existing SFOs to move onto the new notification and reporting regime, replacing the earlier individual notification practice under the 2023 class exemption.

Who this affects

This applies to any family principal or family office manager running a Singapore SFO under Section 13O or 13U, whether newly incorporating or already operating under the older 2023 framework. Multi-family offices face a related but separate set of requirements, including at least S$1 million in base capital, at least two licensed portfolio managers, a compliance officer, and an annual MAS audit, reflecting their status as licensed or exempt fund management entities rather than single-family vehicles.

Eligibility and requirements for ongoing approval

The current AUM condition for Section 13O is S$20 million at entry, tested annually thereafter, with no automatic ramp-up period; funds must maintain this level continuously, not merely at the point of application. Section 13U requires S$50 million in AUM on the same continuous basis. Local business spending floors, S$200,000 a year for 13O and a tiered S$500,000 to S$1,000,000 for 13U depending on fund size, are similarly tested every year, not just at the outset.

Cost and timeline in numbers: the annual review cycle

Annual review typically runs on the fund’s financial year-end, with the family office compiling AUM statements, local spending records and investment professional headcount evidence for submission alongside its tax return. Under the new SFO framework, existing family offices have until 15 June 2027 to transition to the notification and reporting regime, giving roughly a year from the 15 June 2026 effective date to update governance and reporting processes.

Step-by-step: staying in good standing

A family office should first calendar its annual review date against its financial year-end, rather than treating it as an ad hoc task. It then reconciles actual AUM, local spending and staffing against the conditions attached to its approval, ideally a quarter before the review is due, so any shortfall can be corrected in time. Documentation, bank statements, employment contracts for investment professionals, and evidence of local investment activity should be retained on a rolling basis rather than reconstructed at review time. Where the SFO transition deadline of 15 June 2027 applies, the office should also confirm with its corporate secretarial or compliance adviser which specific governance documents need to be refreshed to meet the new notification framework.

Common mistakes and gotchas

The most damaging pattern is treating approval as the finish line: many family offices concentrate resources on the initial MAS application and then under-invest in the recurring obligations, only to find at annual review that AUM dipped below the threshold for part of the year, or that local spending fell short because a planned hire was delayed. A second common mistake is citing the superseded 2023 class exemption or an outdated AUM ramp-up rule (some SFOs still assume a S$10 million entry rising to S$20 million over two years); the current rule is S$20 million at entry with no ramp, so relying on old guidance can mean under-preparing for the real annual test. A third is confusing the SFO notification framework’s 15 June 2027 transition deadline with an extension of the substantive AUM or spending conditions, which it is not; it changes the reporting mechanism, not the underlying thresholds.

FAQs

Is family office MAS approval a one-time event? No. The same AUM, local spending and staffing conditions are tested again at every annual review, not only at initial approval.

What is the current AUM threshold for Section 13O? S$20 million at entry, with no ramp-up period, tested continuously at each annual review; Section 13U requires S$50 million on the same continuous basis.

What changed on 15 June 2026? MAS’s new structure-agnostic class exemption for single family offices took effect, replacing the 2023 individual notification practice, with a 15 June 2027 deadline for existing SFOs to transition.

Do multi-family offices face the same annual audit requirement? Multi-family offices have their own conditions, including S$1 million base capital, at least two licensed portfolio managers, a compliance officer and an annual MAS audit, distinct from single family office notification.

What is the single biggest cause of annual review problems? Under-investing in the recurring obligations after approval, particularly missed local spending floors, weakened Singapore substance, or conditions quietly breached months before the review surfaces them.

Related guides

For how a fund vehicle’s share capital can be structured to reflect a family office’s changing investment mandate, see Section 24 of the Variable Capital Companies Act 2018 on variable capital and share redemption. Family offices hiring investment professionals to meet MAS substance conditions should see the eligibility and requirements checklist for family office hiring under 13O, 13U and GIP. For the common failure patterns behind a rejected or lapsed approval, see our companion piece, family office MAS approval, annual review and audit: common mistakes and rejection reasons.

Authoritative background: MAS’s fund tax incentive scheme pages set out the 13O and 13U conditions referenced above, and IRAS administers the tax filings that accompany each annual review.

Need help with this? Call, SMS or WhatsApp +65 8501 7133, or email [email protected]. Raffles Corporate Services works with a panel of corporate and employment law firms; this article is general information, not legal advice.

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Real people. Right here in Singapore.

Let’s get to work.

Hop on Raffles Corporate Services