Let’s talk

Insights for your business.

Section 165 Companies Act Singapore (2026): Substantial Property Transactions and Director Approvals

Two people reviewing documents at a table

When a Singapore company buys, sells, or leases a significant asset from one of its own directors — or a director wants the company to buy or lease a significant asset — Section 165 of the Companies Act 1967 kicks in. This section, headed “substantial property transactions”, is designed to stop directors quietly enriching themselves through under-priced sales or over-priced purchases between the company and themselves.

This guide explains what a substantial property transaction is, when shareholder approval is required, and how to comply with Section 165 in practice.

What Is a Substantial Property Transaction?

Section 165(1) applies where a company (or its holding or subsidiary) enters into an arrangement to:

The asset must be a “non-cash asset” — meaning property or an interest in property, other than cash. Real estate, shares, intellectual property, vehicles, machinery, and even goodwill all qualify.

When Is Shareholder Approval Required?

Shareholder approval is required if the value of the non-cash asset exceeds either of these thresholds under Section 165(2):

In practice this means: if the asset is worth more than S$100,000 (or 10% of the company’s total assets if that produces a lower number), you must get shareholder approval by ordinary resolution in general meeting before the transaction is entered into.

The “company’s asset value” is measured against the latest audited balance sheet or, where no accounts have been prepared, the paid-up capital.

Who Is a “Connected Person”?

Section 165(11) defines the term. A connected person includes:

A common trap: selling company IP to a Cayman company owned 25% by the director’s brother triggers Section 165, even though the brother himself is not the director.

Consequences of Breach

Section 165(3) provides that a transaction entered into in breach of Section 165 is voidable at the instance of the company. Two consequences follow:

1. Voidable transaction

The company can unwind the transaction. If land or shares were transferred, they can be transferred back. If the counterparty has since disposed of the asset, it becomes harder — but the director remains liable for any loss suffered by the company.

2. Personal accountability

Under Section 165(4), the director involved (and any other director who authorised the transaction) is liable to account to the company for any gain made — and jointly and severally liable with any other person for any loss or damage suffered by the company. This is a classic breach of fiduciary duty claim.

3. Section 391 relief

A director who acted honestly and reasonably may apply to the court for relief under Section 391. Courts have granted relief where the director genuinely believed the value fell below the threshold, but not where the director was cavalier about compliance.

How to Get Section 165 Approval — Step by Step

  1. Value the asset independently. An independent valuation is not strictly required by statute, but is highly advisable for real estate, IP, and unquoted shares. It defeats a later challenge that the transaction was under-priced.
  2. Prepare a directors’ minute disclosing the director’s interest under Section 156 — the conflicted director must not vote on the recommendation to shareholders.
  3. Issue a notice of general meeting to shareholders identifying: the asset, its value, the counterparty, the director involved and the connection.
  4. Pass an ordinary resolution (>50% of votes cast). If your constitution requires a higher threshold, follow that.
  5. Execute the transaction only after the resolution is passed.
  6. Record and file — keep the resolution in the company’s minute books.

Interaction With Other Statutory Provisions

Section 165 does not operate in isolation. Where the same transaction involves:

Corporate secretaries preparing the resolution should walk through all of these before drafting the notice.

Common Real-World Examples

Compliance Checklist for 2026

When to Escalate

If you discover that a Section 165 transaction has already been completed without shareholder approval, do not panic — but do act quickly. Get Singapore legal advice, consider a ratification resolution if the transaction is defensible on the merits, and be transparent with the auditor. Concealment always makes matters worse.

Conclusion

Section 165 substantial property transactions are a red flag on almost every private company audit. The rules are narrow, mechanical, and unforgiving. Get the shareholder resolution before the deal signs, value the asset independently, and paper the file properly. That single hour of preparation prevents the transaction being unwound years later and personal liability landing on the director’s shoulders.

— The Editorial Team, Raffles Corporate Services

Need help with this?

Raffles Corporate Services can handle the ACRA filings, compliance documentation and records for you, and where court proceedings or legal advice are needed, we work with a panel of experienced Singapore law firms who offer cost-effective and efficient legal service and advice.

Email: [email protected]
Call, SMS or WhatsApp: +65 8501 7133

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Real people. Right here in Singapore.

Let’s get to work.

Hop on Raffles Corporate Services